What happened next?
Did she talk loud on the phone during the whole movie?
I like them. Frank fit the role well for the last movie and sounds like for this one as well.
No, very quiet.sounds like she is a mulatto then
The theater was surprisingly well behaved. Only 2 people were noticably texting during the film..... so that was good
Frank Grillo is a pimp
sounds like she is a mulatto then
Frank is great in kingdom, underrated show that.
Was it "baby mama"?
No I met her at the gym.Haven't you learned anything from Getbig? The gym is not a social club.
It was very good. I was surprised. Very stylish. Good acting.Wow! Nice! You are are totally recommending a movie with no positives. Fu*k! ::)
It almost felt like it was a black film. A black horror movie.
I recommend it.
Wow! Nice! You are are totally recommending a movie with no positives. Fu*k! ::)
I had seen part 1.... Which was awful IMO. I didn't see part 2.Fair enough. Walked out half-way through the first one - just irredeemably mean-spirited and shit-edly-directed.
So I didn't expect much from part 3. So because it was light years better than part 1, I gotta say it was a solid movie (for a horror movie)
Black is beautiful :)Looks good on a t-shirt, but doesn't walk.
Pics of said mighty Hebrew?
Mighty in terms of strength? How much does she squat? Is she stronger than you? One tends not to use the word "mighty" and "woman" in the same sentence.
She is definitely not physically stronger than me
She squats. But she has a bad right knee. She can deadlift heavy weight with a trap bar and olympic bar with more comfort. She can really load up the leg press though.
"Mighty" meaning physically strong, but also honorable, decent, honest, and hard-working.
And for those of you who were wondering what happened after the movie: she got into her car and she went home. I got into my car and I went home.
Are you an original hebrew or a Japhite?
She is definitely not physically stronger than meTrue, true. You are one mighty servant of the Almighty.
She squats. But she has a bad right knee. She can deadlift heavy weight with a trap bar and olympic bar with more comfort. She can really load up the leg press though.
"Mighty" meaning physically strong, but also honorable, decent, honest, and hard-working.
And for those of you who were wondering what happened after the movie: she got into her car and she went home. I got into my car and I went home.
True, true. You are one mighty servant of the Almighty.
She is definitely not physically stronger than me
She squats. But she has a bad right knee. She can deadlift heavy weight with a trap bar and olympic bar with more comfort. She can really load up the leg press though.
"Mighty" meaning physically strong, but also honorable, decent, honest, and hard-working.
And for those of you who were thinking big words...And, yes, usually huge liars. Best wishes for your future separation/divorce. Oh, brother.
It was very good. I was surprised. Very stylish. Good acting.
It almost felt like it was a black film. A black horror movie.
I recommend it.
And for those of you who were wondering what happened after the movie: she got into her car and she went home. I got into my car and I went home.
How much is her squat?
The most that I've seen her squat 165 for 10 reps.
WooooOOOOHH!!
Royalty, my boy! Are you still chasing after black girls and getting forced to pay for cinema tickets and popcorn only to go home alone, or have you switched to penis full-time like I did??
Have you ever tried to smuggle a nice cup of piss into the cinema? I highly recommend it!
I just ran some quick analytics (nh) and, if the year ended right now, Phantom Spunker would be PoTY.
She is definitely not physically stronger than me
She squats. But she has a bad right knee. She can deadlift heavy weight with a trap bar and olympic bar with more comfort. She can really load up the leg press though.
"Mighty" meaning physically strong, but also honorable, decent, honest, and hard-working.
And for those of you who were wondering what happened after the movie: she got into her car and she went home. I got into my car and I went home.
It’s too bad that he got Josh banned just in time for Memorial Day weekend
Post proof or GTFO
Read the posts above. He tried to get multiple people banned over the holiday weekend.
All I saw was a wager with NW83.
What is your proof he got josh banned?
Over the holiday weekend everyone was asking why Josh was banned. (Thread made by Wes)
Mods didn’t respond.
Then suddenly, Phantom Spunker was talking like a pussy, threatening to get more people banned. It didn’t work, And he ran off like a pussy.
Just as Phantom Spunker stopped posting, the mods inexplicably moved the thread that Wes had made concerning Josh.
That is not proof of anything.
It’s a really bad look when a non-moderator enters a thread made about a recently banned member, and that non-moderator starts talking about getting other people banned. It’s a really bad look.
Then yesterday, that same non-moderator (Phantom Spunker) warned NaturalWonder83 that he was on “thin ice”. And I believe that he (Phantom Spunker) was discussing another banning!
It's a worse look when someone accuses others of being gimmicks, but is wrong 98% of the time.
Oh, I’m right.
2% hit rate is nothing to be proud of.
Read the posts above. He tried to get multiple people banned over the holiday weekend.
Challenging someone to back up their shit with a ban on the line if they are wrong is not the same thing you ignorant hand freak.What do you mean by “back up their shit”? Who are you referring to?
What do you mean by “back up their shit”? Who are you referring to?
I have never guessed a gimmick correctly in my life.
You claimed the rules of the bet wasn't followed in accord. He says they were and challenged you to put your account on the line as a bet. You wouldn't do it.The rules of the bet were not followed correctly.
The rules of the bet were not followed correctly.
The cup was NOT supposed to be held and should have been FLAT on a surface next to the trophy. That was the agreement. No where did it say to hold the cup!
*******“PLACE an upside down coffee cup NEXT to your NPC trophy.” Not HOLD a cup slightly ABOVE the trophy.*******
Definition of “to place something” i. e. “To place an object” (such as a cup): To put IN a particular position.
Example: "A newspaper had been placed beside my plate.****
Definition of PUT: To place in a specified position or relationship.
The hand was a little "extra" for the hand fetish weirdo to remember the IFBB pro that got her banned by.
The bet was legit and followed. The trophies were there, the coffee cup was upside down there and the name/note was there. BUT... since you are so confident it wasn't. Accept the challenge. Sounds simple.
You failed the upside down coffee cup challenge under multiple accounts. Nobody wants to see you holding up little notes.
Rambone is the only Getbig account to win the challenge.
While I do not believe it has been checked, there has been no reason to think Lurker runs gimmicks.
I couldn't be wrong, but it doesn't feel like his M.O.
It's not as if he is afraid to say anything under the lurker account.
Is this on purpose?
Voice to text.
Was just about to change it.
If you think I have multiple accounts then why don't YOU bet your account on it? I have zero other accounts. If I am right per any mod review, you are permanently banned. If I have or have ever had a gimmick in the entire time I have been here, I will be permanently banned.
So, what say you? Accept or just chicken shit too?
We know Little Bitch. We know. You are chicken shit.
I'd leave it. LOL.
While I do not believe it has been checked, there has been no reason to think Lurker runs gimmicks.
I couldn't be wrong, but it doesn't feel like his M.O.
It's not as if he is afraid to say anything under the lurker account.
Once again, the obsession with getting people banned. It’s the same “banning” nonsense that Phantom Spunker pulled this past weekend.
It’s over. You have outed yourself.
I am too scared to accept Lurker's gimmick account bet.
So to verify, this means you thinkg I have gimmicks and thus have accepted the bet?
There is no bet.
You have embarrassed yourself once more.
The rules of the bet were not followed correctly.
The cup was NOT supposed to be held and should have been FLAT on a surface next to the trophy. That was the agreement. No where did it say to hold the cup!
*******“PLACE an upside down coffee cup NEXT to your NPC trophy.” Not HOLD a cup slightly ABOVE the trophy.*******
Definition of “to place something” i. e. “To place an object” (such as a cup): To put IN a particular position.
Example: "A newspaper had been placed beside my plate.****
Definition of PUT: To place in a specified position or relationship.
There is no bet.
You have embarrassed yourself once more.
“What say you”
Gene, I hate to break it to you but your dad was lying about the horse-cock dildo under his bed. These things do not just appear out of thin air. They require humans to transport them. Placing a cup next to an object requires a hand to manoeuvre it there.No. You are incorrect.
Why don't you just take the bet? I get that you're a timorous bed-wetting sissy with the mind of a child, but it's not like I'm asking you to take your clothes off in front of an adult female or something. It's just a bit of fun. You don't want to let the board down, do you? I used to think you were cool…
(https://media.tenor.com/c9P0jhEZ5QAAAAAM/laugh-michael-jordan.gif)
Royalty, it's nice to see you learned your lesson, LOL. Quaking in your boots at the thought of another harmless bet, and too petrified to share another one of your beloved hand photos. You're a broken man.
WHAT SAY YOU??
No. You are incorrect.
Placing means an object is at rest on a surface.
Royalty still swinging and missing.
Royalty, it's nice to see you learned your lesson, LOL. Quaking in your boots at the thought of another harmless bet, and too petrified to share another one of your beloved hand photos. You're a broken man.
WHAT SAY YOU??
Incorrect. No such syntax is implied. I can place my hand in the air, thus violating your nonsense - furthermore, I can create a fist and thrust it into your anus and at not stage do I need to come to rest. Additionally, as you probably have a ridiculously cavernous anus, I will probably never hope to find a surface to rest on, anyway.No. Don't think so. Thanks for offering your opinion though...I really appreciate it.
I place you on the dimmest of the wits on this board.
No. You are incorrect.
Placing an object and holding it in the air are fundamentally different. Placing means an object is at rest on a surface. The surface provides a continuous upward force (normal force) equal to gravity, meaning zero physical effort and energy are required. Holding in the air means actively counteracting gravity. Whether you hold it with your muscles or a mechanical device, continuous energy and a constant upward force are required to keep the object from falling.
When you hold an object in the air, you are actively using energy to counteract gravity. When you place it on a surface, the surface itself bears the weight, leaving the object in a resting state.
The key differences between the two include:
Forces at Play: Holding an object requires upward muscular or mechanical force. Placing it on a solid surface involves the surface pushing upward with an equal and opposite reaction force (known as the Normal Force), meaning the net force on the object is zero.
Energy Expenditure: Holding an object requires constant work. Placing an object on a surface requires zero energy to keep it in place.
External Influences: An object held in the air is only subject to gravity and wind. An object on a surface experiences friction, which prevents it from sliding unless pushed, and structural support that keeps it entirely stationary.
You would think with all this confidence it would be a sure win for her. She needs a win at this point. But she won't take the bait because she is scared. Just a whining little bitch in regards to anything she posts. Her self respect has evacuated the premises. Self preservation is taking a front seat now. Her life has nothing in it be Getbig. This is the only place that hasn't cut off contact with her and her mental issues. Which should be taken into account how many actively dislike her and her board pollution on here.
So it would be correct to assume you're a proud member of the Phantom Spunker Brain Trust?
Save it, street-rat. You can never recover from this egregious display of cowardice. No one is wanting to read your irrelevant ChatGPT-written tangents about the laws of physics. The question is on whether or not the prestigious upside-down cup challenge was followed correctly, and you've revealed yourself to be a shameless liar on this matter by falsely claiming that the cup, and I quote, 'should have been FLAT on a surface next to the trophy. That was the agreement.'Yes it was written by AI...A MACHINE...And we all know that machines do not make mistakes.
At no point was it stated that a cup should be flat on a surface. You threw that in out of sheer desperation because you're panicked, stupid, and militantly gay.
The instruction was to place a cup next to my trophy, and I was photographed literally in the act of placing the cup next to my esteemed NPC Muscle-beast trophy from the 1990s. The fact that my hand (along with my entire body in the reflection of the trophy) was visible only adds credibility to the process because that cannot be Photoshopped as easily.
Further, the instructions on how to complete the challenge were clearly articulated by its creator, OneMoreRep (PBUH), and these were to take the photograph while holding the cup. Anybody wanting to invoke the challenge is free to do so, but it must be completed in accordance with the instructions as originally drafted.
The fact that you are arguing against OMR on this matter, and at a time when he is still absent and convalescing after surviving the Hankins Wars, is the ultimate sign of disrespect. I can only hope that he bums your head off then throws you into timeout when he returns.
Yes it was written by AI...A MACHINE...And we all know that machines do not make mistakes.
You are wrong. "Place a cup" meant it should have been positioned in 1 location and then left alone to be photographed.
Original post from Royalty: "Real quick... put an upside coffee cup next to 1 or 2 of your trophies and take a picture." Explain to me how you understood that as it would be okay to hold the cup in midair? Where did Royalty say "take a photo holding an upside down cup"?
Just a brief glance at your typical word salad shows me that you're too far gone and delusional to ever come to your senses about this.
So what are the official stipulated rules for the Upside-Down Cup Challenge?
No. You are incorrect.
1. Original post from Royalty: "And take a pic. Since you claim to be an former pro bodybuilder. Real quick... put an upside coffee cup next to 1 or 2 of your trophies and take a picture."
2. Then Dumb-Dumb posts a photo of himself holding an upside-down cup slightly above the floor that his trophy was set on. I'm still waiting to hear his fascinating explanation as to why he feels holding a cup in midair and slightly above the base of his trophy is the same as placing an upside down cup next to his trophy.
Why couldn't he just put the upside down cup on the floor next to his trophy? What was the reason for holding his phone in 1 hand while holding the cup in the other hand? Who in their right mind would make it awkward for themselves to take the photo? Why not just put the cup on the floor next to the trophy, take a quick photo, and bam you are done?
And why take the photo crouched down on the floor? Why not just put the trophy and cup on a counter or table and be able to stand up easily as you take the photo? And imagine having 2 hands to take the photo? Yet he chose to put the trophy on the floor, hold the cup in 1 hand, and awkwardly take the photo holding his camera phone in the other hand. Makes no sense.
Then again, this is Phantom Spunker we're dealing with here. We've come to expect this type of behavior and justification from him. How can you be mad at him? He's like a cherished and beloved slow person from a village. People always smile when they see him riding around town on his bike waving at everyone. He really brightens everyone day with his positive, innocent mindset.
Or was the coffee cup held in the female hand photoshopped in?
After careful consideration, I submitted the details of this post to AI and this was the response:GREAT POST. I AGREE.
Based on the strict phrasing of the original request, no, the rules were not followed.
Here is a breakdown of why the submission failed the verification criteria, along with the psychological and logistical reasons behind the poster's awkward behavior.
Why the Rules Were Broken
The Placement Rule:
Royalty explicitly demanded the user "put [the cup] next to" the trophies.
The Execution:
"Dumb-Dumb" held the cup in mid-air. Hovering an object above a trophy is mechanically and definitionally different from placing it down on the same surface.
Why the Poster Avoided Putting the Cup Down
In forum verification battles (common in bodybuilding and fitness communities to expose "fake natties" or imposters), this exact type of awkward compliance usually points to digital manipulation (Photoshop).
The Shadow Problem:
If he placed the cup on the floor next to a real trophy, the cup would cast a physical shadow on the floor and the trophy. If the trophy was digitally edited into an old photo of his room, matching the lighting and shadows of a newly placed cup perfectly is incredibly difficult.
The Perspective Trap:
Forcing the cup to float in mid-air allows the poster to obscure the exact point of contact with the floor. This makes it easier to mask perspective mismatches if the trophy was spliced into the image from an old photograph.
Why Choose the Awkward "One-Handed Crouch"?
The user likely chose the floor and the one-handed camera hold for specific tactical reasons to hide a hoax:
Staging a Pre-existing Asset:
The trophies were likely already sitting on the floor in an old, authentic photograph. Moving heavy or fragile trophies to a counter just for a forum call-out takes effort, or worse, he didn't actually have the trophies physically present to move them to a table.
Deliberate Distortion:
Taking a photo crouched down with a shaky, one-handed grip creates natural motion blur and awkward angles. In the world of photo forensics, a slightly blurry or poorly angled photo is a perfect shield to hide bad pixel edges, mismatched resolution, and editing artifacts.
By making the photo intentionally chaotic and failing the exact structural rules of the request, the poster avoided the definitive proof Royalty was looking for.
Where is the photo in question?
https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=702445.msg10441754#msg10441754
According to AI:AGREED
Based on the provided images, the user did not follow the exact rules of the initial request, and the provided photos reveal significant anomalies that heavily support the forum's skepticism.
1. Rule Evaluation (Image 1)
The Rule:
Place an upside-down coffee cup on the floor next to the trophy.
The Reality:
The user is holding a white teacup/mug sideways/tilted in mid-air above a handwritten card that says "Phantom Spunker."
Verdict:
Failed. The cup is neither upside down nor resting on the floor next to the trophy.
2. Technical Red Flags & Verification Flaws
Image 1:
The "Pro" Trophy Mismatch Amateur Labeling:
The trophy features a poorly printed, glued-on paper label reading "IFBB MUSCLE BEACH Pro".
Professional IFBB Pro trophies feature high-quality engraved metal plaques, not crooked, home-printed paper slips taped over an existing base.
Awkward Floating Cup:
Holding the cup in mid-air avoids having to place it on the tile, which completely circumvents the shadow/lighting verification.
Image 2:
The Junk BinIrrelevant Trophies:
This image shows a yellow storage bin filled with random, non-bodybuilding items (a Malibu rum coconut shell, boxing gloves, a generic boxing statuette, ice cleats, and old metal tins).
Deflection:
None of these items substantiate a "former pro bodybuilder" claim. Showing random boxing memorabilia does not prove bodybuilding credentials.
Image 3:
The Sandow ReplicaThe "Sandow" Trophy:
This is a replica of the iconic Eugen Sandow trophy awarded to Mr. Olympia winners.
The Lie:
Only elite Mr. Olympia champions receive an authentic Sandow trophy. A regional or standard "IFBB Pro" would never win one. Replica Sandow statues are widely commercially available for purchase online by fans, making this highly unconvincing as proof of a professional career.
Summary
The user ("Phantom Spunker") repeatedly failed to follow the explicit "cup on the floor" constraint because doing so forces clean perspective and shadow lines. Instead, they relied on holding a handwritten note in front of a commercial replica statue (Image 3), a junk bin (Image 2), and a trophy with a fake paper label (Image 1).
The forum's skepticism is completely justified.
GREAT POST. I AGREE.
No one cares about what you agree with. You already pussied out of waging your account on it. You disrespected OMR and tried to make up your own version of the challenge. You tried to go off on a silly tangent using ChatGPT. You ignored the fact that it said you were wrong and should be banned after claiming it is omniscient.I did not make up any version of anything. I stated my observations about the photos that you "took". All I did was reference the original rules of the wager.
Safe to say you're quite the retard, and now you want to rant and rave forever about a wager that supposedly didn't concern you. Nothing makes me happier than seeing you and Royalty flap around like raving lunatics, LOL.
AI had more to say:
A detailed examination of the handwritten note across all three images reveals crucial inconsistencies in the physical paper and lighting, providing strong evidence of manipulation, recycling, or digital insertion.
1. Paper Geometry and Cutting Anomalies
The "Perfect" Rectangles:
In Image 1 and Image 2, the white card appears to be a roughly cut, thick piece of paper or cardstock. However, in Image 3, the card magically transitions into a pristine, razor-sharp rectangle with perfectly straight edges.
Perspective Mismatch:
In Image 1, the card is allegedly propped up at an angle on the floor, yet the text remains completely flat and perpendicular to the camera lens. It lacks the natural geometric distortion (foreshortening) that happens when a flat object tilts away from a camera lens.
2. Lighting and Shadow Forensics (The Dead Giveaway)
Missing Thumb Shadows:
In Image 2 and Image 3, a thumb/hand enters the frame to hold the card.
In a real environment, a physical thumb pressing against a piece of paper under ambient room lighting casts a distinct, localized shadow right where the flesh meets the paper. In these images, the boundary between the thumb and the card is artificially stark, indicating the hand or card may have been layered in.Illumination Inconsistency:
In Image 3, the bronze Sandow statue has strong highlights coming from a window on the left, casting the right side of the statue into deep shadow. However, the white note held directly in front of it is completely uniformly lit, lacking the gradient or shadow drop you would expect from the statue blocking the light.
3. Handwriting Analysis
While the handwriting style itself is highly similar across the images (likely written by the same person using a blue ballpoint or fine felt-tip pen), the way the text interacts with the environment is highly suspect:
The "Static" Note Trick:
The exact layout, spacing, and letter curves of "Phantom Spanker" match so perfectly between Image 2 and Image 3 that it strongly suggests the user didn't write multiple notes. They either held the exact same physical slip of paper while trying to capture different angles, or they digitally cut a single "good" image of the note and pasted it onto the other photos.
Resolution and Pixelation:
If you zoom in closely on the boundaries of the text in Image 1, the resolution of the handwriting ink appears slightly sharper than the blurry texture of the tiled floor behind it. This mismatch in digital noise (grain) usually happens when a high-resolution foreground element is superimposed over a lower-quality background.
Conclusion
The forum poster did not just fail the cup placement rule; they likely utilized digital manipulation or pre-staged cutouts to fabricate the verification.
The note acts as a "floating digital asset" rather than a real piece of paper interacting naturally with the room's lighting and physics.
So what are the official stipulated rules for the Upside-Down Cup Challenge?
I did not make up any version of anything. I stated my observations about the photos that you "took". All I did was reference the original rules of the wager.
I did not use ChatGPT. I asked AI on Google if holding an object is the same as placing/putting an object on a surface.
Why didn't you just put the cup on a counter next to your trophy and take the photo? Would have taken a few seconds. Why did you feel the need to crouch down on the floor, hurting your elderly arthritic knees, hold the phone in 1 hand, and hold the cup in the other? Why make it so complicated?
God, I'm actually bored of reading you now. You're not funny, you're not logical, and you're genuinely too stupid to converse with. At least Royalty attempts to keep it interesting with the occasional mock-up or title change. You had your chance to do something and you pussied out. Now you can live with the knowledge that you've exposed yourself as a coward and a retard.Take care.
This thread is now closed!!
All joking aside, I asked it how sure it was, and it literally replied:I would agree with that.
'Based on a technical review of the visual mechanics, I am 99% certain that those photos are deliberately manipulated or fabricated.'
Little Bitch is having a nervous breakdown for sure, haha. After lying to the board again and treating Josh like some sort of idiot attack-dog to be manipulated into fighting his battles for him, he's got nothing left. I suspect we might see another suicide-by-mod attempt soon.
36pt font meltdown
You are wrong. "Place a cup" meant it should have been positioned in 1 location and then left alone to be photographed.
Original post from Royalty: "Real quick... put an upside coffee cup next to 1 or 2 of your trophies and take a picture."
1. Original post from Royalty: "And take a pic. Since you claim to be an former pro bodybuilder. Real quick... put an upside coffee cup next to 1 or 2 of your trophies and take a picture."
I did not use ChatGPT. I asked AI on Google if holding an object is the same as placing/putting an object on a surface.
He did put an upside down coffee cup next to one of his trophies. At no time did Royalty say that it had to be on the ground, in the air, or whatever. It had to be :Don't worry about it. We're all set here.
1) upside down
2) next to his trophy
and it was.
Per Phantom Spanker, this thread has been closed.
Good thing I am not Phantom then isn't it? Or am I? Want to take Little Bitch's place in the gimmick bet?I understand, but he closed the thread. I'm sorry. There's nothing I can do.
For what it's worth, I didn't prompt the AI anything, I just put in NaturalWonder83's post and all three photos.It made total sense.
And then asked how sure it was about the issues it flagged in the photos and it said 99%.
I understand, but he closed the thread. I'm sorry. There's nothing I can do.
I understand, but he closed the thread. I'm sorry. There's nothing I can do.
It made total sense.
According to AI:
Based on the provided images, the user did not follow the exact rules of the initial request, and the provided photos reveal significant anomalies that heavily support the forum's skepticism.
1. Rule Evaluation (Image 1)
The Rule:
Place an upside-down coffee cup on the floor next to the trophy.
The Reality:
The user is holding a white teacup/mug sideways/tilted in mid-air above a handwritten card that says "Phantom Spunker."
Verdict:
Failed. The cup is neither upside down nor resting on the floor next to the trophy.
2. Technical Red Flags & Verification Flaws
Image 1:
The "Pro" Trophy Mismatch Amateur Labeling:
The trophy features a poorly printed, glued-on paper label reading "IFBB MUSCLE BEACH Pro".
Professional IFBB Pro trophies feature high-quality engraved metal plaques, not crooked, home-printed paper slips taped over an existing base.
Awkward Floating Cup:
Holding the cup in mid-air avoids having to place it on the tile, which completely circumvents the shadow/lighting verification.
Image 2:
The Junk BinIrrelevant Trophies:
This image shows a yellow storage bin filled with random, non-bodybuilding items (a Malibu rum coconut shell, boxing gloves, a generic boxing statuette, ice cleats, and old metal tins).
Deflection:
None of these items substantiate a "former pro bodybuilder" claim. Showing random boxing memorabilia does not prove bodybuilding credentials.
Image 3:
The Sandow ReplicaThe "Sandow" Trophy:
This is a replica of the iconic Eugen Sandow trophy awarded to Mr. Olympia winners.
The Lie:
Only elite Mr. Olympia champions receive an authentic Sandow trophy. A regional or standard "IFBB Pro" would never win one. Replica Sandow statues are widely commercially available for purchase online by fans, making this highly unconvincing as proof of a professional career.
Summary
The user ("Phantom Spunker") repeatedly failed to follow the explicit "cup on the floor" constraint because doing so forces clean perspective and shadow lines. Instead, they relied on holding a handwritten note in front of a commercial replica statue (Image 3), a junk bin (Image 2), and a trophy with a fake paper label (Image 1).
The forum's skepticism is completely justified.