Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Kwon on June 27, 2026, 04:55:34 PM

Title: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Kwon on June 27, 2026, 04:55:34 PM



Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Kwon on June 27, 2026, 05:05:49 PM
I know they say Armie Hammer is a Cannibal and all, but i am glad he took this role
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 27, 2026, 05:51:52 PM
Rampage was made by the director,  probably his only decent movie, though just mean and nasty.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on June 28, 2026, 02:56:09 AM


Loved the clips I saw!

Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Mr.Mojo on June 28, 2026, 03:52:54 AM
Full movie :

Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 28, 2026, 04:08:06 AM
Started watching,  as expected,  some horrendous acting
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Kwon on June 28, 2026, 05:57:39 AM
Started watching,  as expected,  some horrendous acting

Still a great message
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Kwon on June 28, 2026, 07:23:18 AM
Muslims are trying to ban this Movie now







Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 28, 2026, 09:29:53 AM
Ban this movie for being too realistic in what way? It has some good violence and gore and some looks pretty naff, there's far worse out there.
It's just a guy getting pissed off and punishing arseholes and the characters have a religion and beliefs, just like every human being on the planet.
Interestingly Uwe Bol the director makes films that generate no money as he uses an old tax law from his country that generates the funding.  He doesn't to conform or please anyone to put out exactly what he's trying to say
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Royalty on June 28, 2026, 09:45:59 AM
Started watching,  as expected,  some horrendous acting


Ban this movie for being too realistic in what way? It has some good violence and gore and some looks pretty naff, there's far worse out there.
It's just a guy getting pissed off and punishing arseholes and the characters have a religion and beliefs, just like every human being on the planet.
Interestingly Uwe Bol the director makes films that generate no money as he uses an old tax law from his country that generates the funding.  He doesn't to conform or please anyone to put out exactly what he's trying to say

Hench is trying to sound nonchalant about an underage girl being beaten and gang raped.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 28, 2026, 11:30:23 AM

Hench is trying to sound nonchalant about an underage girl being beaten and gang raped.

Dunno what you're getting at there,  I was meaning there's a thousand films out there with people punishing arseholes/ getting revenge so it's not out of the ordinary and other films have done more brutally with better effects.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: chaos on June 28, 2026, 11:40:56 AM
Dunno what you're getting at there,  I was meaning there's a thousand films out there with people punishing arseholes/ getting revenge so it's not out of the ordinary and other films have done more brutally with better effects.
People are whining because it involves muzzies.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Irongrip400 on June 28, 2026, 03:06:09 PM
I’m ten minutes in and realize this director is shit. This movie is low budget as hell.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Irongrip400 on June 28, 2026, 04:26:25 PM
Just finished it. It’s worth the watch and maybe this will help push Europe forward towards stemming the flow of migrants from outside the continent. Acting was pretty shit from the supporting cast, although I’m sure English wasn’t their first language.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 28, 2026, 04:47:11 PM
Yea most of supporting cast was shit but did you recognise the cop who told him on the phone he needs to bring him in?
Just finished it. It’s worth the watch and maybe this will help push Europe forward towards stemming the flow of migrants from outside the continent. Acting was pretty shit from the supporting cast, although I’m sure English wasn’t their first language.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Irongrip400 on June 28, 2026, 06:32:10 PM
Yea most of supporting cast was shit but did you recognise the cop who told him on the phone he needs to bring him in?

Only thing I remember him from was Mobsters.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 28, 2026, 08:59:01 PM
Only thing I remember him from was Mobsters.
He was Mark Hoffman in the Saw movies
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: galain on June 29, 2026, 12:07:47 AM
Liam Neeson in Taken - basically the same plot. Why didn't that one get banned all across Europe?

There were even European bad guys in that one.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on June 29, 2026, 01:24:03 AM
Be thankful we are allowed to even have movies; and not just big screen propaganda programming, like in the Macintosh commercial:



Think about the future when the machines take over and it’s the end of days. These (boring to some) movies will no doubt be considered part of the “good old days” that we will desperately yearn for and want back.

Every idea has been done and redone and redone and redone in Hollywood. This movie was at least a bit different. Reminded me of Falling Down with M. Douglas.

What would you prefer to watch? This new cult classic or the dumb new Rock movie? Hollywood is cooked. All we have left are reboots of rebooted reboots and AI concept trailers. We must accept this unfortunate reality that any new movie, that isn’t a reboot, is not going to have a multi-million dollar budget.

This film is the best that Hollywood can muster right now, without crappy AI. Not happy with that? Get a deep pocketed investor and open your own film studio!
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: obsidian on June 29, 2026, 04:45:27 AM
Liam Neeson in Taken - basically the same plot. Why didn't that one get banned all across Europe?

There were even European bad guys in that one.
Because Liam only went after bad guys who abducted his daughter. The message of the movie was not let's target immigrants and politicians because they are destroying our society. It had a more singular personal connection with Bryan's daughter's abduction.

Citizen Vigilante is a bigger threat to the status quo because it targets what White people in Europe and other White nations have thought about. Why not take out the treasonous scum politicians, judges, and violent immigrant scum?
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: obsidian on June 29, 2026, 04:49:08 AM
The movie was ok. Some spoiler info. Not nearly enough politicians and immigrant scum were killed. The cops that entered his kill room were idiots. They all had shields but dropped them when they entered the room. They could clearly see the two gun barrels poking at them and stood there like cannon fodder. I hate when movies make dumb mistakes like this. Make it more challenging. He could have just blown them all up once they entered the room. Nobody is going to stand there exposed with two guns pointing through holes.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Irongrip400 on June 29, 2026, 05:51:33 AM
The movie was ok. Some spoiler info. Not nearly enough politicians and immigrant scum were killed. The cops that entered his kill room were idiots. They all had shields but dropped them when they entered the room. They could clearly see the two gun barrels poking at them and stood there like cannon fodder. I hate when movies make dumb mistakes like this. Make it more challenging. He could have just blown them all up once they entered the room. Nobody is going to stand there exposed with two guns pointing through holes.

He got all those rape perps, that was pretty cool. I wished he’d have done more to the two dudes from the bus though.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 29, 2026, 05:58:40 AM
Only White people can be evil rapists.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 29, 2026, 06:25:15 AM
Just because we have a lack of good movies doesn't mean this one should just get a pass. It had a few decent kills but alot of it was bad.  He rigged his place to kill all those cops so now he's just as bad as the rapists he killed. None of them needed to die, so he ended being a mass murderer, he even forced that car with innocent people off the road and they most likely died. The logic for his actions went right out the window.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on June 29, 2026, 06:52:18 AM
Just because we have a lack of good movies doesn't mean this one should just get a pass. It had a few decent kills but alot of it was bad.  He rigged his place to kill all those cops so now he's just as bad as the rapists he killed. None of them needed to die, so he ended being a mass murderer, he even forced that car with innocent people off the road and they most likely died. The logic for his actions went right out the window.
This film gets a definite PASS in my book. It's already a cult classic and is just as good as Machete, The Substitute, and History of Violence.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 29, 2026, 07:50:14 AM
This film gets a definite PASS in my book. It's already a cult classic and is just as good as Machete, The Substitute, and History of Violence.
Never liked machete but you put that up there with a history of violence! That movie actually has good acting and plot  ;D
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: Kwon on June 29, 2026, 10:12:54 AM
Just because we have a lack of good movies doesn't mean this one should just get a pass. It had a few decent kills but alot of it was bad.  He rigged his place to kill all those cops so now he's just as bad as the rapists he killed. None of them needed to die, so he ended being a mass murderer, he even forced that car with innocent people off the road and they most likely died. The logic for his actions went right out the window.

This movie gets the ULTIMATE pass of the Ages.
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on June 29, 2026, 10:55:58 AM
This movie gets the ULTIMATE pass of the Ages.
YES!

Never liked machete but you put that up there with a history of violence! That movie actually has good acting and plot  ;D

One of my favorite films!

"MMMM this is some good coffee. Hard to find coffee this good in Philadelphia. I want to thank you for the coffee, Joey."

"How come he's so good at killing people?"

"Joooooey Cusak. Your name...is Joey Cusak...and you're from Philly."
Title: Re: Pity theyre banning this movie for being too realistic
Post by: hench on June 29, 2026, 11:25:49 AM
YES!

One of my favorite films!

"MMMM this is some good coffee. Hard to find coffee this good in Philadelphia. I want to thank you for the coffee, Joey."

"How come he's so good at killing people?"

"Joooooey Cusak. Your name...is Joey Cusak...and you're from Philly."

Ed Harris great in these kind of gangster roles, everyone was good too