Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Bhank: Latest news and misadventures
« Last post by chaos on Today at 08:38:28 AM »
I can't think of enough any good things to say about Bhanky.
:D :D
42
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Trump = Winning
« Last post by chaos on Today at 08:35:40 AM »
We cannot have a conversation because you are a troll and a simpleton, and you are unable to disagree without acting like a donkey.  And you write like a child.
Right? The arrogance of the self proclaimed smartest snow mexican ever is astounding. The way he thinks to position himself above others with his misguided, manipulated and flatly wrong opinions is hilarious. The best part is he doesn't even realize that we are laughing at him for his TDS.

By the nose ring!!
43
 :)
44
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/newsom-pitches-federal-wealth-tax-after-losing-california-battle/ar-AA26zp68?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=7d02894dfd55409fbba107edb5486a69&ei=11

Alarming for the getbigger billionaires.

I don't like these proposals. Most taxes begin with promises that they'll only target "the super rich," but they rarely stay that way. Over time they will quietly expand to cover more and more people. A wealth tax will follow the same pattern, gradually ensnaring a larger share of the public as the years go by.

Beyond the scope creep, the tax will encourage people to shift their wealth into less traceable and harder to value assets. It's relatively easy to calculate the value of publicly traded stocks. But assessing land and real estate will require surveys. Private assets like fine art, jewelry, or gold bars stored in safes are even more difficult to track and value.

In the end, this will distort behavior. People will move away from productive investments, change how they hold their assets, or even relocate abroad.
Horrible idea. Rather than dial in their spending, they want to keep fucking people over, rich/poor/whatever is left of the middle class.....everyone getting screwed by taxes. We need a political enema.
45
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Mike 0'Hearn is 6 foot 7 inches!!
« Last post by Dave D on Today at 07:59:09 AM »
Hence my "for the most part" and frankly there still isn't that much separation between Arnold and Jake Gyllenhall.  You're just more familiar with Arnold's shitty work.  Watch Prince of Persia or Accidental Love.  There's 1000 great actors for every role, easily, but there is only one Arnold.  No one else could have played Conan or The Terminator as well, no one.

I guess I don’t understand what you mean by “for the most part”.  There certainly is “acting ability”. Those who can do and those who can’t don’t.

You can make this distinction for any elite endeavor, then. The difference between a great college football player and an elite level NFL player is splitting hairs in terms of athletic ability and effort. But a 5’4 160 man isn’t going to play as an offensive tackle.


In the 2 movies you mentioned Arnold played roles that called for his physical appearance. I will argue that he is a worse actor today than he was in terminator. Gyllenhall is a better performer today than he was in Prince of Persia, but that was a movie based on a good game, no actor was saving that.
46
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Mike 0'Hearn is 6 foot 7 inches!!
« Last post by Rambone on Today at 07:51:23 AM »
He was in Over The Top, the armwrestling movie with Stallone, way back.

Think he can drive a big rig? I bet he could! He was arm wrasslin’ for one!
47


Market is due for a correction to the AI overvaluation just like happened with the dotcom era.
48
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Mike 0'Hearn is 6 foot 7 inches!!
« Last post by Never1AShow on Today at 07:25:01 AM »
If you can drive a van, you can fly a plane!

He was in Over The Top, the armwrestling movie with Stallone, way back.
49
40,000$. Camp to learn how to relax they’re throats

 ;D
50
 :)
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10